lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
Date
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> > I think the problem is that I haven't allocated system call numbers for
> > any arches other than x86 - even the x86 syscall numbers are provisional
> > until the patchset is taken upstream. I'm not sure of the best way to
> > deal with this - make the samples dependent on the X86 arch?
>
> But the sample programs are built with HOSTCC, so you can't depend on
> ARCH (since I, for one, am cross compiling). Maybe SUBARCH. Better
> would be to use either Kconfig's shell primitive or some make magic to
> figure out if the syscall number define's are defined.

I meant put the dependency in the Kconfig.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-19 08:01    [W:0.152 / U:4.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site