lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/6] iommu/dma: Add support for non-strict mode
Hi Robin,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>
> 1. Save the related domain pointer in struct iommu_dma_cookie, make iovad
> capable call domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all to flush TLB.
> 2. During the iommu domain initialization phase, base on domain->non_strict
> field to check whether non-strict mode is supported or not. If so, call
> init_iova_flush_queue to register iovad->flush_cb callback.
> 3. All unmap(contains iova-free) APIs will finally invoke __iommu_dma_unmap
> -->iommu_dma_free_iova. If the domain is non-strict, call queue_iova to
> put off iova freeing, and omit iommu_tlb_sync operation.

Hmm, this is basically just a commentary on the code. Please could you write
it more in terms of the problem that's being solved?

> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> [rm: convert raw boolean to domain attribute]
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/iommu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 511ff9a1d6d9..092e6926dc3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
> };
> struct list_head msi_page_list;
> spinlock_t msi_lock;
> +
> + /* Only be assigned in non-strict mode, otherwise it's NULL */
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> };
>
> static inline size_t cookie_msi_granule(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> @@ -257,6 +260,17 @@ static int iova_reserve_iommu_regions(struct device *dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void iommu_dma_flush_iotlb_all(struct iova_domain *iovad)
> +{
> + struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + cookie = container_of(iovad, struct iommu_dma_cookie, iovad);
> + domain = cookie->domain;
> +
> + domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all(domain);

Can we rely on this function pointer being non-NULL? I think it would
be better to call iommu_flush_tlb_all(cookie->domain) instead.

> +}
> +
> /**
> * iommu_dma_init_domain - Initialise a DMA mapping domain
> * @domain: IOMMU domain previously prepared by iommu_get_dma_cookie()
> @@ -275,6 +289,7 @@ int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
> struct iova_domain *iovad = &cookie->iovad;
> unsigned long order, base_pfn, end_pfn;
> + int attr = 1;

Do we actually need to initialise this?

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-18 19:10    [W:0.122 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site