lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC 00/60] Coscheduling for Linux
From
Date
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 18:25 +0200, Jan H. Schönherr wrote:
> On 09/14/2018 01:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Jan H. Schönherr wrote:
> > >
> > > B) Why would I want this?
> > > In the L1TF context, it prevents other applications from
> > > loading
> > > additional data into the L1 cache, while one application tries
> > > to leak
> > > data.
> >
> > That is the whole and only reason you did this;
>
> It really isn't. But as your mind seems made up, I'm not going to
> bother
> to argue.

What are the other use cases, and what kind of performance
numbers do you have to show examples of workloads where
coscheduling provides a performance benefit?

--
All Rights Reversed.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-18 16:40    [W:0.163 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site