lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3
From
Date


On 2018/9/13 1:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 12/09/18 17:57, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:25AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> 1. change the type of global variable and struct member named "non_strict" from
>>> "int" to "bool".
>>> 2. cancel the unnecessary parameter "strict" of __arm_lpae_unmap which was added
>>> in v4.
>>> 3. change boot option "arm_iommu" to "iommu.non_strict".
>>> 4. convert __iommu_dma_unmap to use iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_tlb_sync(), because
>>> non-leaf unmaps still need to be synchronous.
>>>
>>> Thanks for Robin's review comments.
>>
>> Since this is 90% of the way there now, I suggest Robin picks up what's here
>> and incorporates his remaining review comments directly (especially since it
>> sounded like Zhen Lei hasn't got much free time lately). With that, I can
>> queue this lot via my smmu branch, which already has some stuff queued
>> for SMMUv3 and io-pgtable.
>>
>> Please shout if you have any objections, but I'm keen for this not to
>> languish on the lists given how close it is!
>
> Sure, having got this far I'd like to see it get done too. I'll make some time and give it a go.

Thank you very much.

I've been too busy lately, at least I still have no time this week, I also think it's been too long.

So sorry and thanks again.

>
> Robin.
>
> .
>

--
Thanks!
BestRegards

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-13 04:02    [W:0.047 / U:7.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site