lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 02/27] arm64: allwinner: h6: add system controller device tree node
From


于 2018年9月12日 GMT+08:00 下午10:49:12, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> 写到:
>On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 于 2018年9月4日 GMT+08:00 下午4:40:56, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> 写到:
>> >On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jernej Skrabec
><jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
>> >>
>> >> As we have already binding for the H6 system controller, add its
>node
>> >> to the device tree.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
>> >> [fixed compatible string]
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
>> >
>> >Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>>
>> By the way can these patches be applied first? (patches
>> related to syscon).
>>
>> They're also needed for EMAC.
>
>Applied.
>
>BTW, the H6 system control EMAC register also has the internal PHY
>related controls seen on H3/H5. IIRC you previously mentioned that
>they have no effect?

Yes, because the "internal PHY" on H6 is on AC200.

The internal/external mux bit has effect (although it will mux
to a non-existent PHY when switching to "internal", render
EMAC not usable), but it also has effect on A64 (same effect
with H6), on which it's not documented.

>
>ChenYu
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-12 17:38    [W:0.067 / U:3.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site