lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: Introduce suspend states supported properties
From
Date


On 12/09/18 12:19, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 12 September 2018 04:32 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/09/18 05:09, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Introuduce linux generic suspend states supported properties.
>>> It is convenient for the generic suspend path to have
>>> the knowledge of the suspend states supported based on the
>>> device tree properties based on which it can either be suspended
>>> or safely bailed out of suspend if none of the suspend states
>>> are supported.
>>>
>>
>> NACK for any bindings that are linux specific. The suspend feature is so
>> platform dependent that I see no need for generic Linux bindings for the
>> same.
>
> suspend to mem and suspend to disk are pretty generic states and i agree
> implementation is platform dependent so why not have properties that
> convey if they are supported?
>

We already have power domains and idle states for that. If you need to
restrict few states on some platform for whatever reasons, just disable
those states. I don't see the need to add any more bindings for the same.

> Is the disagreement over making the properties being linux specific?
>

Yes.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-12 13:38    [W:0.042 / U:8.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site