[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:37:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Processor local interrupts really should be architected and there are
> really not that many of them.

And that is what they are.

> But well, RISC-V decided obvsiouly not to learn from mistakes made by
> others.

I don't think that is the case. I think Atup misreads what reserved
means - if you look at section 2.3 of the RISC-V privileged spec
it clearly states that reserved fields are for future use and not
for vendor specific use.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-11 00:19    [W:0.147 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site