lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on arm64
From
Date
On 08/08/18 15:12, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:09:02PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>> while (1) {
>>> start = (unsigned)random() % (LEN + 1);
>>> end = (unsigned)random() % (LEN + 1);
>>> if (start > end)
>>> continue;
>>> for (i = start; i < end; i++)
>>> data[i] = val++;
>>> memcpy(map + start, data + start, end - start);
>>> if (memcmp(map, data, LEN)) {
>>
>> It may be worth trying to do a memcmp(map+start, data+start, end-start)
>> here to see whether the hazard logic fails when the writes are unaligned
>> but the reads are not.
>>
>> This problem may as well appear if you do byte writes and read longs
>> back (and I consider this a hardware problem on this specific board).
>
> I triad to insert usleep(10000) between the memcpy and memcmp, but the
> same corruption occurs. So, it can't be read-after-write hazard. It is
> caused by the improper handling of hazard between the overlapping writes
> inside memcpy.
>
> Mikulas
>

I don't think you've told us what form the corruption takes. Does it
lose some bytes? Modify values beyond the copy range? Write completely
arbitrary values?

The overlapping writes in memcpy never write different values to the
same location, so I still feel this must be some sort of HW issue, not a
SW one.

R.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-08 17:02    [W:0.130 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site