lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH RFC 06/10] fs: Shrink only (SB_ACTIVE|SB_BORN) superblocks in super_cache_scan()
From
Date
This patch prepares superblock shrinker for delayed unregistering.
It makes super_cache_scan() avoid shrinking of not active superblocks.
SB_ACTIVE is used as such the indicator. In case of superblock is not
active, super_cache_scan() just exits with SHRINK_STOP as result.

Note, that SB_ACTIVE is cleared in generic_shutdown_super() and this
is made under s_umount mutex. Function super_cache_scan() also takes
the mutex, so it can't skip this flag cleared.

SB_BORN check is added to super_cache_scan() just for uniformity
with super_cache_count(), while super_cache_count() received SB_ACTIVE
check just for uniformity with super_cache_scan().

After this patch super_cache_scan() becomes to ignore unregistering
superblocks, so this function is OK with splitting unregister_shrinker().
Next patches prepare super_cache_count() to follow this way.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
fs/super.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 457834278e37..9222cfc196bf 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
if (!trylock_super(sb))
return SHRINK_STOP;

+ if ((sb->s_flags & (SB_BORN|SB_ACTIVE)) != (SB_BORN|SB_ACTIVE)) {
+ freed = SHRINK_STOP;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);

@@ -110,6 +115,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, sc);
}

+unlock:
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
return freed;
}
@@ -136,7 +142,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
* avoid this situation, so do the same here. The memory barrier is
* matched with the one in mount_fs() as we don't hold locks here.
*/
- if (!(sb->s_flags & SB_BORN))
+ if ((sb->s_flags & (SB_BORN|SB_ACTIVE)) != (SB_BORN|SB_ACTIVE))
return 0;
smp_rmb();

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-07 17:39    [W:0.158 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site