[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: New remoteproc driver for TI PRU
Hi David,

On 08/06/2018 11:32 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 06/29/2018 07:17 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> On 06/29/2018 12:44 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> On 06/29/2018 04:58 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> +Suman & Tero
>>>> Hi David,
>>>> On 24/06/18 00:08, David Lechner wrote:
>>>>> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:43:59 -0500
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/8] New remoteproc driver for TI PRU
>>>>> This series adds a new remoteproc driver for the TI Programmable
>>>>> Runtime Unit
>>>>> (PRU) that is present in some TI Sitara processors. This code has
>>>>> been tested
>>>>> working on AM1808 (LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3) and AM3358 (BeagleBone Green).
>>>> This is great. We have been working on something similar and I think
>>>> it would
>>>> be great if we can collaborate to get all our needs addressed.
>>> Yes, I have used the PRU with the TI kernel on BeagleBone so I've seen
>>> the TI
>>> implementation. My primary interest is in the AM1808, which has a far
>>> simpler
>>> PRU than other SoCs. So, I was hoping I could get away with just
>>> implementing
>>> the basic stuff that I need and let TI add the more complex stuff later.
>> Thanks for the series. PRUSS is present on many SoCs now, and each with
>> their own integration quirks, both in terms of SoC connections as well
>> as internal sub-modules within the subsystem. We currently support
>> AM335x, AM437x, AM57xx, Keystone 2 based 66AK2G and a newer generation
>> AM65x as well. It should be relatively straight-forward to scale this
>> for AM1808/OMAP-L138 as well. The move to the standard Common Clock and
>> Reset frameworks for clocks with the Davinci chips should make it
>> relatively straight-forward for the architecture pieces.
>> I will take a look at your series in detail sometime next week, and
>> mostly post our series to the upstream lists as well within the next
>> couple of weeks so that it is easier for discussion on the upstream
>> lists.
> Have you had time to look at this yet? If you are too busy, I can submit
> a v2 with the interrupt controller broken out into a separate driver.

Yeah, I worked on it a bit around -rc4 time, but didn't get a chance to
complete the cleanup & testing before I had to shift to some other
tasks. If you are interested, I can share my branch. I will mostly get
back to this towards the latter half of next week. Anyway, I am
expecting 4.19-rc1 to be in a better shape w.r.t Davinci platform as the
genpd and CCF stuff comes in, and the pm_runtime usage for clocking in
my PRUSS drivers will fit well with those available.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-07 03:41    [W:0.098 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site