lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: WARNING in try_charge
On Tue 07-08-18 05:26:23, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/08/07 2:56, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > So the oom victim indeed passed the above force path after the oom
> > invocation. But later on hit the page fault path and that behaved
> > differently and for some reason the force path hasn't triggered. I am
> > wondering how could we hit the page fault path in the first place. The
> > task is already killed! So what the hell is going on here.
> >
> > I must be missing something obvious here.
> >
> YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY MISSING MY MAIL!
>
> I already said this is "mm, oom: task_will_free_mem(current) should ignore MMF_OOM_SKIP for once."
> problem which you are refusing at https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg133774.html .
> And you again ignored my mail. Very sad...

Your suggestion simply didn't make much sense. There is nothing like
first check is different from the rest.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-06 22:38    [W:0.149 / U:1.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site