lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/fair: sync expires_seq in distribute_cfs_runtime()
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:17 AM <bsegall@google.com> wrote:
> Yes, in practice what's actually going to happen is that the
> runtime_remaining will be put to 1 by distribute, the cfs_rq will be
> unthrottled, and then when it runs it will go negative immediately and
> hit the negative check in expires, so expires_seq being wrong will not
> actually matter. In addition, the worst thing that will happen if one of
> the account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, 0) paths is hit first is that it will
> lose 1ns of quota, which also doesn't really matter.

Ah, I see.

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-03 23:56    [W:0.047 / U:2.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site