[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] lightnvm: pblk: recover chunk state on 1.2 devices
> On 3 Aug 2018, at 14.46, Matias Bjørling <> wrote:
> On 08/03/2018 02:37 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>> On 3 Aug 2018, at 14.30, Matias Bjørling <> wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2018 02:02 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>> On 3 Aug 2018, at 13.57, Matias Bjørling <> wrote:
>>>>> On 07/24/2018 09:54 AM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 13.28, Matias Bjørling <> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/29/2018 01:22 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2018, at 13.14, Matias Bjørling <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06/28/2018 11:12 AM, Javier González wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Open-Channel 1.2 spec does not define a mechanism for the host to
>>>>>>>>>> recover the block (chunk) state. As a consequence, a newly format device
>>>>>>>>>> will need to reconstruct the state. Currently, pblk assumes that blocks
>>>>>>>>>> are not erased, which might cause double-erases in case that the device
>>>>>>>>>> does not protect itself against them (which is not specified in the spec
>>>>>>>>>> either).
>>>>>>>>> It should not be specified in the spec. It is up to the device to handle
>>>>>>>>> double erases and not do it.
>>>>>>>>>> This patch, reconstructs the state based on read errors. If the first
>>>>>>>>>> sector of a block returns and empty page (NVM_RSP_ERR_EMPTYPAGE), then
>>>>>>>>>> the block s marked free, i.e., erased and ready to be used
>>>>>>>>>> (NVM_CHK_ST_FREE). Otherwise, the block is marked as closed
>>>>>>>>>> (NVM_CHK_ST_CLOSED). Note that even if a block is open and not fully
>>>>>>>>>> written, it has to be erased in order to be used again.
>>>>>>>>> Should we extend it to do the scan, and update the write pointer as
>>>>>>>>> well? I think this kind of feature already is baked into pblk?
>>>>>>>> This is already in place: we scan until empty page and take it from
>>>>>>>> there. This patch is only for the case in which we start a pblk instance
>>>>>>>> form scratch. On a device already owned by pblk, we would not have the
>>>>>>>> problem we are trying to solve here because we know the state.
>>>>>>> Agree. What I meant was that when we anyway are recovering the state,
>>>>>>> we could just as well update ->wp and set to NVM_CHK_ST_OPEN and so
>>>>>>> forth for the initialization phase.
>>>>>> In 1.2 the use of chunk metadata is purely fictional. We respect the
>>>>>> chunk state machine as we transition lines, but all the write pointers
>>>>>> are ignored. Instead, we use the line bitmap to point to the next
>>>>>> writable entry. This is BTW the same way we it in open lines on 2.0 too.
>>>>> Now I understand where you are coming from. I had the understanding
>>>>> that we where using the write pointer now that we moved to 2.0,
>>>>> looking through the code, that wasn't the case. :) Which means that
>>>>> pblk doesn't work with a devices that implements 2.0. Yikes... I knew
>>>>> I had forgot a detail when support was added into pblk.
>>>> I think you misunderstood; pblk does support 2.0 devices. What happens
>>>> is that we transform the per chunk WP in 2.0 into the line bitmap to
>>>> simplify the lookup. The point being that we do not need to create a
>>>> fictional chunk for 1.2 devices since we do the translation to the
>>>> bitmap directly. Does this make sense?
>>> The chunk->wp isn't used anywhere. So it can't take wp into account.
>>> It uses the EMPTYPAGE marker from 1.2 instead. See pblk-core and
>>> pblk-recovery.
>> I see that the patches for this are still internal. Will post for 4.20
> Thanks. Please also put a Fixes: on, so it gets backported appropriately.

Sure. I will.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-03 14:56    [W:0.049 / U:5.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site