lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200
Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files.
>
> Tested, no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.

Thanks! An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing
whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of
emails in the future. I doubt your official Tested-by implies you
necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp.
if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above.

BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file
resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list
email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing.

Again, thanks for testing!

Kim

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-24 23:46    [W:0.079 / U:2.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site