[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 22/22] s390: doc: detailed specifications for AP virtualization

On 08/22/2018 12:13 PM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> ... about control domains
> Talked with the s390 firmware guys. The convention that the control domain
> mask is a superset of the usage domain mask is only true for 1st level guests.
> It is absolutely valid to run a kvm guest with restricted control domain
> mask bitmap in the CRYCB. It is valid to have an empty control domain mask
> and the guest should be able to run crypto CPRBs on the usage domain(s) without
> any problems. However, nobody has tried this.

I did try this ;).

> regards
> Harald Freudenberger

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-22 12:46    [W:0.111 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site