lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion
From
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:15:25 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
>> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
>> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
>> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port. I
>> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
>> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>> was dropped.
>>
>> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
>> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
>>
>> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
>> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
>> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
>>
>> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
>> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
>> of what was merged.
>
> I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most
> sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers.

Thanks! Unless I've managed to screw something up I don't see these in your
tree, but I also don't see any feedback from anyone else.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-02 20:32    [W:0.090 / U:6.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site