lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] mm: Move check for SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE to do_shrink_slab()
From
Date
In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker
is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently
all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two:
super_block shrinker and workingset shrinker), but something may
change in the future.

(Andrew, this may be merged to mm-iterate-only-over-charged-shrinkers-during-memcg-shrink_slab)

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ea0a46166e8e..0d980e801b8a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -455,6 +455,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
: SHRINK_BATCH;
long scanned = 0, next_deferred;

+ if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
+ nid = 0;
+
freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY)
return freeable;
@@ -680,9 +683,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
.memcg = memcg,
};

- if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
- sc.nid = 0;
-
ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
ret = 0;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-02 13:01    [W:0.084 / U:19.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site