lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 14/22] KVM: s390: interfaces to clear CRYCB masks
From
Date
On 08/15/2018 09:10 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:11 -0400
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Introduces two new KVM interface to clear the APM, AQM and ADM masks in
>> the guest's CRYCB. The VCPUs are taken out of SIE to ensure the VCPUs do
>> not get out of sync.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
>> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
>> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
>> Tested-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 4a739d4..07e58d8 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>> __u64 tecmc; /* 0x00e8 */
>> __u8 reservedf0[12]; /* 0x00f0 */
>> #define CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK 0x00000003
>> +#define CRYCB_FORMAT0 0x00000000
> This should probably go into a different patch (define is not used
> here)?

You are spot on. It needs to go in patch 15 where it is first used.

>
>> #define CRYCB_FORMAT1 0x00000001
>> #define CRYCB_FORMAT2 0x00000003
>> __u32 crycbd; /* 0x00fc */
>> @@ -861,6 +862,8 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> struct kvm_async_pf *work);
>>
>> +void kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(struct kvm *kvm);
>> +
>> extern int sie64a(struct kvm_s390_sie_block *, u64 *);
>> extern char sie_exit;
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index f7de123..8d8a65a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -1919,6 +1919,21 @@ static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
>> kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT1;
>> }
>>
>> +void kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> + kvm_s390_vcpu_block_all(kvm);
>> +
>> + memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0, 0,
>> + sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0));
>> + memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1, 0,
>> + sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1));
>> +
>> + kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock_all(kvm);
>> + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks);
> A quick grep shows that kvm-related exports tend to be
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Should that also be done here?

I did some internet searching to find out why the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
macro is used
rather than EXPORT_SYMBOL. I found the link below which explains why.
According to
that article, if the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro is used, modules that do
not carry a
GPL-compatible license can not use the function. Apparently Linus
Trovalds and the
lawyers he consulted believe it codifies the intention in code itself
makes the code
more flexible and a lot less likely to be misunderstood. It is further
pointed out
that "circumventing the GPL-only export requires an explicit action,
making it clear
that the copyright infringement was a deliberate act.

Since our modules are GPL-licensed, it would probably behoove us to use the
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro to export this function.

https://lwn.net/Articles/154602/

>
>> +
>> static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
>> {
>> struct cpuid cpuid;


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-15 19:57    [W:0.139 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site