lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 15/22] s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:48:12 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Implements the open callback on the mediated matrix device.
> The function registers a group notifier to receive notification
> of the VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM event. When notified,
> the vfio_ap device driver will get access to the guest's
> kvm structure. The open callback must ensure that only one
> mediated device shall be opened per guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

> @@ -602,7 +633,6 @@ static ssize_t matrix_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> }
> DEVICE_ATTR_RO(matrix);
>
> -

Nit: whitespace change

> static struct attribute *vfio_ap_mdev_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_assign_adapter.attr,
> &dev_attr_unassign_adapter.attr,

(...)

> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_mdev_open_once
> + *
> + * @matrix_mdev: a mediated matrix device
> + *
> + * Return 0 if no other mediated matrix device has been opened for the
> + * KVM guest assigned to @matrix_mdev; otherwise, returns an error.
> + */
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_open_once(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> + struct kvm *kvm)

You're passing kvm in here, but do not use it.

> +{
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *m;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev.lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(m, &matrix_dev.mdev_list, list) {
> + if ((m != matrix_mdev) && (m->kvm == matrix_mdev->kvm)) {

If you used it here instead of matrix_mdev->kvm...

> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev.lock);
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev.lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> +
> + if (action != VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM)
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> + matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, group_notifier);
> +
> + matrix_mdev->kvm = data;
> + if (data == NULL)
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_open_once(matrix_mdev, data);

...you could move this up to before overwriting matrix_mdev->kvm and
bailing out when the check failed, which makes more sense to me.

> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = kvm_ap_validate_crypto_setup(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

It probably makes more sense to return NOTIFY_DONE in the error case
(NOTIFY_BAD does not sound like a good idea as it would stop processing
the notifier chain).

> +
> + vfio_ap_mdev_copy_masks(matrix_mdev);
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}

Otherwise, looks sane.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-15 18:09    [W:0.981 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site