lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm -v4 04/21] mm, THP, swap: Support PMD swap mapping in swapcache_free_cluster()
From
Date
> +#ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP
> +static inline int cluster_swapcount(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> +{
> + if (!ci || !cluster_is_huge(ci))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return cluster_count(ci) - SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define cluster_swapcount(ci) 0
> +#endif

Dumb questions, round 2: On a CONFIG_THP_SWAP=n build, presumably,
cluster_is_huge()=0 always, so cluster_swapout() always returns 0. Right?

So, why the #ifdef?

> /*
> * It's possible scan_swap_map() uses a free cluster in the middle of free
> * cluster list. Avoiding such abuse to avoid list corruption.
> @@ -905,6 +917,7 @@ static void swap_free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long idx)
> struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
>
> ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
> + memset(si->swap_map + offset, 0, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> cluster_set_count_flag(ci, 0, 0);
> free_cluster(si, idx);
> unlock_cluster(ci);

This is another case of gloriously comment-free code, but stuff that
_was_ covered in the changelog. I'd much rather have code comments than
changelog comments. Could we fix that?

I'm generally finding it quite hard to review this because I keep having
to refer back to the changelog to see if what you are doing matches what
you said you were doing.

> @@ -1288,24 +1301,30 @@ static void swapcache_free_cluster(swp_entry_t entry)
>
> ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
> VM_BUG_ON(!cluster_is_huge(ci));
> + VM_BUG_ON(!is_cluster_offset(offset));
> + VM_BUG_ON(cluster_count(ci) < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> map = si->swap_map + offset;
> - for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++) {
> - val = map[i];
> - VM_BUG_ON(!(val & SWAP_HAS_CACHE));
> - if (val == SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
> - free_entries++;
> + if (!cluster_swapcount(ci)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++) {
> + val = map[i];
> + VM_BUG_ON(!(val & SWAP_HAS_CACHE));
> + if (val == SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
> + free_entries++;
> + }
> + if (free_entries != SWAPFILE_CLUSTER)
> + cluster_clear_huge(ci);
> }

Also, I'll point out that cluster_swapcount() continues the horrific
naming of cluster_couunt(), not saying what the count is *of*. The
return value doesn't help much:

return cluster_count(ci) - SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-09 19:13    [W:0.157 / U:3.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site