lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/memblock: replace u64 with phys_addr_t where appropriate
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 04:54:49PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (07/04/18 10:03), Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c | 2 +-
> > arch/microblaze/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +-
> > arch/sparc/kernel/ds.c | 2 +-
> > arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 4 ++--
> > arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c | 2 +-
>
> Isn't it "funny" that parisc, ia64, powerpc don't use pf/pF in arch code,
> but x86, arm, etc. do use pf/pF in arch code?
>
> Surely, I do understand why we have pf/pF in mm, drivers and all over the
> place. But still, I'm surprised.

That's because somebody (including you) did the conversion ;-)

> -ss
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-04 17:22    [W:0.094 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site