[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH for 4.18] rseq: use __u64 for rseq_cs fields, validate user inputs
----- On Jul 3, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
>> > I can simply document that loads/stores from/to all struct rseq fields
>> > should be thread-local then ?
>> I'm not sure that covers things sufficiently. You really want the
>> userspace load/stores to be single instructions.
> Actually, I think we should try very hard to limit even that to _just_
> the rseq pointer itself.
> Everything else can be filled in ahead of time with non-atomic stores,
> and then the last thing that happens - and the only thing that wants
> that final "one last atomic write" is the rseq pointer write.
> No?

Well a small nit here: the rseq->rseq_cs pointer store is performed
at the _very beginning_ of the rseq critical section. We indeed want
that store to be performed as a single instruction by user-space.

What I think you have in mind as "one last atomic write" is the commit
instruction at the end of the critical section, which does not touch
any field in struct rseq.

> So I'd suggest that the only part we aim to have any "atomic" behavior
> at all is for the individual fields in "struct rseq" itself. So the
> cpu id and the base pointer and the flags. And even they are
> thread-local, so the atomicity is not about the kernel, but about user
> space needing to read and update them in word-sized chunks.
> End result: absolutely nothing is atomic for the kernel.

Yes, +1. If everyone is OK with that I'll go and implement the changes
within the coming day.



Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-03 20:10    [W:0.109 / U:2.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site