lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 12/16] arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support
From
Date
Hi Akashi,

On 24/07/18 07:57, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Enabling crash dump (kdump) includes
> * prepare contents of ELF header of a core dump file, /proc/vmcore,
> using crash_prepare_elf64_headers(), and
> * add two device tree properties, "linux,usable-memory-range" and
> "linux,elfcorehdr", which represent respectively a memory range
> to be used by crash dump kernel and the header's location

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> index 5d102a1054b3..1b2c27026ae0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -97,8 +97,12 @@ static inline void crash_post_resume(void) {}
> #define ARCH_HAS_KIMAGE_ARCH
>
> struct kimage_arch {

> - void *dtb_buf;
> + void *dtb;

This change should be in an earlier patch, otherwise this series doesn't build
during bisect.

With the build-issues fixed:
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

Some boring Nits:

> unsigned long dtb_mem;
> + /* Core ELF header buffer */
> + void *elf_headers;
> + unsigned long elf_headers_mem;
> + unsigned long elf_headers_sz;
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> index b8297f10e2ef..7356da5a53d5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> @@ -38,12 +44,30 @@ static int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
> void **dtb_buf, unsigned long *dtb_buf_len)
> {
> void *buf = NULL;
> - size_t buf_size;
> + size_t buf_size, range_size;
> int nodeoffset;
> int ret;
>
> /* duplicate dt blob */
> buf_size = fdt_totalsize(initial_boot_params);
> + range_size = of_fdt_reg_cells_size();
> +
> + if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> + buf_size += fdt_prop_len("linux,elfcorehdr", range_size);
> + buf_size += fdt_prop_len("linux,usable-memory-range",
> + range_size);
> + }

Nit: it would be better if these strings were defined in a header file somewhere
so we don't risk a typo if this gets refactored.



> @@ -129,6 +170,43 @@ static int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int prepare_elf_headers(void **addr, unsigned long *sz)
> +{
> + struct crash_mem *cmem;
> + unsigned int nr_ranges;
> + int ret;
> + u64 i;
> + phys_addr_t start, end;
> +
> + nr_ranges = 1; /* for exclusion of crashkernel region */

> + for_each_mem_range(i, &memblock.memory, NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE, 0,
> + &start, &end, NULL)

Nit: MEMBLOCK_NONE


Thanks,

James

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-26 15:37    [W:0.184 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site