lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] ti_am335x_tsc: Enable wakeup capability
From
Date


On Monday 23 July 2018 11:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday 30 June 2018 04:03 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>>> On AM335x, resistive TSC can wakeup the system from low power state.
>>>>> Currently, parent MFD device is marked as wakeup source, which is
>>>>> inaccurate as its the touch event generated by TSC thats the wakeup
>>>>> source. This series moves all wakeup related calls to operate on TSC
>>>>> device instead of MFD. It also marks TSC IRQ as wakeup capable, so that
>>>>> its not disabled during system suspend.
>>>>>
>>>>> This series is based on Dmitry's comments here:
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/24/65
>>>>>
>>>>> There are many new patches in this series, hence did not mark this as v4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vignesh R (5):
>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't mark TSCADC MFD as wakeup capable
>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark TSC device as wakeup source
>>>>> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Keep ADC interface on if child is wakeup
>>>>> capable
>>>>> iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Disable ADC during suspend unconditionally
>>>>> Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark IRQ as wakeup capable
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 12 ++++--------
>>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gentle ping... Could you review/pick this series? MFD amd IIO bits are
>>>> already ACKed
>>>
>>> MFD patches are reviewed "for my own reference" meaning that we
>>> haven't yet agreed on a merge plan yet.
>>
>> I think this series makes sense to be pushed through a single tree as
>> opposed to being spread between 3, even if it could technically be
>> possible. It looks like Jonathan is fine with going it through either
>> his or some other tree, I am fine with it going through MFD.
>
> I'm happy either way.
>
Thanks Dmitry, Jonathan and Lee Jones!

Could this be applied to one of the trees now? MFD perhaps?

--
Regards
Vignesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-24 19:33    [W:0.136 / U:7.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site