lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH ghak90 (was ghak32) V3 09/10] debug audit: read container ID of a process
On 2018-07-20 18:15, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:02 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Add support for reading the audit container identifier from the proc
> > filesystem.
> >
> > This is a read from the proc entry of the form
> > /proc/PID/audit_containerid where PID is the process ID of the task
> > whose audit container identifier is sought.
> >
> > The read expects up to a u64 value (unset: 18446744073709551615).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/base.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> > index 318dff4..ca8bfe2 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> > @@ -1303,6 +1303,21 @@ static ssize_t proc_sessionid_read(struct file * file, char __user * buf,
> > .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> > };
> >
> > +static ssize_t proc_contid_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> > + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > + struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
> > + ssize_t length;
> > + char tmpbuf[TMPBUFLEN*2];
> > +
> > + if (!task)
> > + return -ESRCH;
> > + length = scnprintf(tmpbuf, TMPBUFLEN*2, "%llu", audit_get_contid(task));
> > + put_task_struct(task);
> > + return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, tmpbuf, length);
> > +}
>
> While I still remain very nervous about opening the audit container ID
> up for abuse by making it accessible, I understand that this would
> make things a lot easier us (e.g. testing) and perhaps the container
> engines as well. In order to limit the potential for abuse, what do
> you think about restricting read access to those processes which have
> CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL, similar to what we do for setting the audit
> container ID?

That seems like a reasonable restriction.

> > static ssize_t proc_contid_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > {
> > @@ -1333,6 +1348,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_contid_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > }
> >
> > static const struct file_operations proc_contid_operations = {
> > + .read = proc_contid_read,
> > .write = proc_contid_write,
> > .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> > };
> > @@ -3030,7 +3046,7 @@ static int proc_pid_patch_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> > REG("loginuid", S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO, proc_loginuid_operations),
> > REG("sessionid", S_IRUGO, proc_sessionid_operations),
> > - REG("audit_containerid", S_IWUSR, proc_contid_operations),
> > + REG("audit_containerid", S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR, proc_contid_operations),
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> > REG("make-it-fail", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_fault_inject_operations),
> > @@ -3422,7 +3438,7 @@ static int proc_tid_comm_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> > REG("loginuid", S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO, proc_loginuid_operations),
> > REG("sessionid", S_IRUGO, proc_sessionid_operations),
> > - REG("audit_containerid", S_IWUSR, proc_contid_operations),
> > + REG("audit_containerid", S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR, proc_contid_operations),
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> > REG("make-it-fail", S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR, proc_fault_inject_operations),
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-21 21:25    [W:0.117 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site