lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 7/8] dt-bindings: Introduce interconnect consumers bindings
From
Date
Hi,

On 07/11/2018 01:34 AM, Evan Green wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Add documentation for the interconnect consumer bindings, that will allow
>> to link a device node (consumer) to its interconnect controller hardware.
>>
>> Tha aim is to enable drivers to request a framework API to configure an
>> interconnect path by providing their struct device pointer and a name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>> index 6e2b2971b094..0ad65dccbe8b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>> @@ -31,3 +31,30 @@ Example:
>> clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK>,
>> <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK>;
>> };
>> +
>> +
>> += interconnect consumers =
>> +
>> +The interconnect consumers are device nodes which consume the interconnect
>> +path(s) provided by the interconnect provider. There can be multiple
>
> I wonder if this sentence could be more descriptive. Maybe something like:
>
> The interconnect consumers are device nodes which dynamically express
> their bandwidth requirements along interconnect paths they are
> connected to.
>
> ...or choose a better one if this one's a mouthful.
>

This sounds much better. Thank you!

Georgi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-20 16:58    [W:0.060 / U:9.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site