lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update BBT related flags
On 2018-07-19 03:12, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Abhishek,
>
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
> 23:41:44 +0200:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul
>> 2018
>> 23:36:37 +0200:
>>
>> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200
>> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Abhishek,
>> > >
>> > > Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> wrote on Fri, 6 Jul 2018
>> > > 13:21:58 +0530:
>> > >
>> > > > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT.
>> > >
>> > > Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip
>> > > the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a
>> > > RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM.
>> > >
>> > > So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a
>> > > mistake, right?
>> >
>> > ->scan_bbt() is also taking care of building the in-RAM BBT based on
>> > BBM when no on-flash BBT is provided, so I think it's the right thing
>> > to do.
>>
>> Oh right. Then doing so is harmless.
>
> Could you please update the commit log to reflect this aspect?
>

Thanks Miquel and Boris.
I will update the commit log.

Regards,
Abhishek

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-20 09:15    [W:0.092 / U:4.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site