lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/2] x86/bugs: Fix the AMD SSBD usage of the SPEC_CTRL MSR
Date
On AMD, the presence of the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature does not imply that the
SSBD mitigation support should use the SPEC_CTRL MSR. Other features could
have caused the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature to be set, while a different SSBD
mitigation option is in place.

Update the SSBD support to check for the actual SSBD features that will
use the SPEC_CTRL MSR.

Fixes: 6ac2f49edb1e ("x86/bugs: Add AMD's SPEC_CTRL MSR usage")
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 404df26..5c0ea39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ enum spectre_v2_mitigation_cmd {
guestval |= guest_spec_ctrl & x86_spec_ctrl_mask;

/* SSBD controlled in MSR_SPEC_CTRL */
- if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD))
+ if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) ||
+ static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
hostval |= ssbd_tif_to_spec_ctrl(ti->flags);

if (hostval != guestval) {
@@ -533,9 +534,10 @@ static enum ssb_mitigation __init __ssb_select_mitigation(void)
* Intel uses the SPEC CTRL MSR Bit(2) for this, while AMD may
* use a completely different MSR and bit dependent on family.
*/
- if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL))
+ if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) &&
+ !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD)) {
x86_amd_ssb_disable();
- else {
+ } else {
x86_spec_ctrl_base |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
x86_spec_ctrl_mask |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-02 23:36    [W:0.098 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site