[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [4.17 regression] Performance drop on kernel-4.17 visible on Stream, Linpack and NAS parallel benchmarks
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:45:51AM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> Hi Mel,
> we have compared 4.18 + git://
> sched-numa-fast-crossnode-v1r12 against 4.16 kernel and performance results
> look very good!

Excellent, thanks to both Kamil and yourself for collecting the data.
It's helpful to have independent verification.

> We see performance gains about 10-20% for SPECjbb2005. NAS results are a
> little bit noisy but show overall performance gains as well (total runtime
> for reduced from 6 hours 34 minutes to 6 hours 26 minutes to give you a
> specific example).


> The only benchmark showing a slight regression is stream
> - but the regression is just a few percents ( upto 10%) and I think it's
> not a real concern given that it's an artificial benchmark.


> How is your testing going? Do you think
> that sched-numa-fast-crossnode-v1r12 series can make it into the 4.18?

My own testing completed and the results are within expectations and I
saw no red flags. Unfortunately, I consider it unlikely they'll be merged
for 4.18. Srikar Dronamraju's series is likely to need another update
and I would need to rebase my patches on top of that. Given the scope
and complexity, I find it unlikely they would be accepted for an -rc,
particularly this late of an rc. Whether we hit the 4.19 merge window or
not will depend on when Srikar's series gets updated.

> Thanks a lot for your efforts to improve the performance!

My pleasure.

Mel Gorman

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-17 12:04    [W:0.068 / U:8.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site