[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] leds: core: Introduce generic pattern interface
Hi Pavel,

On 07/14/2018 11:20 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>>> It also drew my attention to the issue of desired pattern sysfs
>>> interface semantics on uninitialized pattern. In your implementation
>>> user seems to be unable to determine if the pattern is activated
>>> or not. We should define the semantics for this use case and
>>> describe it in the documentation. Possibly pattern could
>>> return alone new line character then.
> Let me take a step back: we have triggers.. like LED blinking.
> How is that going to interact with patterns? We probably want the
> patterns to be ignored in that case...?
> Which suggest to me that we should treat patterns as a trigger. I
> believe we do something similar with blinking already.
> Then it is easy to determine if pattern is active, and pattern
> vs. trigger issue is solved automatically.

I'm all for it. I proposed this approach during the previous
discussions related to possible pattern interface implementations,
but you seemed not to be so enthusiastic in [0].


Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-15 22:07    [W:0.095 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site