[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC V2] virtio: Add platform specific DMA API translation for virito devices
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:27:04AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 21:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I re-read that discussion and I'm still unclear on the
> > original question, since I got several apparently
> > conflicting answers.
> >
> > I asked:
> >
> > Why isn't setting VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM on the
> > hypervisor side sufficient?
> I thought I had replied to this...
> There are a couple of reasons:
> - First qemu doesn't know that the guest will switch to "secure mode"
> in advance. There is no difference between a normal and a secure
> partition until the partition does the magic UV call to "enter secure
> mode" and qemu doesn't see any of it. So who can set the flag here ?

This seems weird to me. As a rule HV calls should go through qemu -
or be allowed to go directly to KVM *by* qemu. We generally reserve
the latter for hot path things. Since this isn't a hot path, having
the call handled directly by the kernel seems wrong.

Unless a "UV call" is something different I don't know about.

> - Second, when using VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, we also make qemu (or
> vhost) go through the emulated MMIO for every access to the guest,
> which adds additional overhead.

David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-04 11:13    [W:0.202 / U:4.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site