lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes
From
Date
On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>>
>> The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit
>> eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES") with the goal of
>> accounting objects that can be reclaimed, but cannot be allocated via a
>> SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT cache. This is now possible via kmalloc() with
>> __GFP_RECLAIMABLE flag, and the dcache external names user is converted.
>>
>> The counter is however still useful for accounting direct page allocations
>> (i.e. not slab) with a shrinker, such as the ION page pool. So keep it, and:
>
> Btw, it looks like I've another example of usefulness of this counter:
> dynamic per-cpu data.

Hmm, but are those reclaimable? Most likely not in general? Do you have
examples that are?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-30 12:12    [W:0.080 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site