[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/18] rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash bucket.
On Sat, Jun 02 2018, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> On 06/02/2018 01:03 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Yes the concept looks good to me. But I would like to hear from
>> Eric/Dave as to whether this would be acceptable for existing
>> network hash tables such as the ones in inet.
> What about lockdep support ?

bitlocks don't have native lockdep support.
I would be fairly easy to add lockdep support to
rht_{lock,unlock,unlocked} if you think it is worthwhile.
It could only really help if a hash-function or cmp-function took a
lock, but it is not a great cost so we may as well just do it.
I'll try to have a patch in the next day or so.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-04 02:25    [W:0.115 / U:12.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site