lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mm/memblock: add missing include <linux/bootmem.h>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 25-06-18 19:15:12, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Commit 26f09e9b3a06 ("mm/memblock: add memblock memory allocation apis")
> > introduced two new function definitions:
> >
> > memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic()
> > memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid()
> >
> > Commit ea1f5f3712af ("mm: define memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw")
> > introduced the following function definition:
> >
> > memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw()
> >
> > This commit adds an include of header file <linux/bootmem.h> to provide
> > the missing function prototypes. Silence the following gcc warning
> > (W=1):
> >
> > mm/memblock.c:1334:15: warning: no previous prototype for `memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > mm/memblock.c:1371:15: warning: no previous prototype for `memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > mm/memblock.c:1407:15: warning: no previous prototype for `memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >
> > It also adds #ifdef blockers to prevent compilation failure on mips/ia64
> > where CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=n. Because Makefile already does:
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) += memblock.o
> >
> > The #ifdef has been simplified from:
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && defined(CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM)
> >
> > to simply:
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM)
>
> Well, I would apreciate an explanation why do we need NO_BOOTMEM guard
> in the first place rather than why HAVE_MEMBLOCK is not needed.
>
> > Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
>
> Anyway this looks better. I wish we can actually get rid of bootmem
> allocator which would simplify this as well but that is another topic.

There only 5 arches with bootmem left :)

I've started looking into it, but it goes slow :(

> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> > ---
> > v2: Simplify #ifdef
> >
> > mm/memblock.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> > index 03d48d8835ba..611a970ac902 100644
> > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/sections.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > @@ -1224,6 +1225,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
> > return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM)
> > /**
> > * memblock_virt_alloc_internal - allocate boot memory block
> > * @size: size of memory block to be allocated in bytes
> > @@ -1431,6 +1433,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(
> > (u64)max_addr);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > /**
> > * __memblock_free_early - free boot memory block
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-27 12:06    [W:0.105 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site