lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: ACPI support in common clock framework
From
Date


On 25/06/18 17:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2018-06-16 08:50:18)
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this for clk_enable/disable? What about clk_set_rate() or
>>> clk_set_phase()? Is ACPI's AML taking care of that?
>>
>> That's for clk_enable/disable AFAICS.
>>
>> AML doesn't manage device performance states at all.
>
> Alright. We may need to add a better way for device drivers to get
> handles to clk pointers on ACPI firmware so they can change frequencies
> or phase, etc.

Is there any specific usecase/device needing this in the kernel ? SPI
slaves ?

> Right now it's all through clkdev and it looks to be
> mostly based on string matching of connection names instead of
> associating clks with devices.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-25 19:16    [W:0.081 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site