lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Kbuild updates for 4.18 (2nd round)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:29 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
>
> I cannot come up with a name better than CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG.

How about just calling it STACKPROTETOR_STRONG and leaving it at that?

Make the "CC_HAVE_xyz" model for compiler feature tests, but when
actually picking an actual option, it's not really about the compiler
any more, except in the sense that it depends on it.

I guess we could leave the CC_STACKPROTECTOR option as-is, just
because it apparently has a lot of small uses in actual code too, but
there is absolutely nothing that uses CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
outside of the actual compiler option choice (and config files)

Linus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-13 19:50    [W:0.057 / U:4.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site