lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: add ccree binding
Hi Gilad,

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:19:10PM +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>>> Add bindings for CryptoCell instance in the SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
>>
>> In so far as I can review the details of this (which is not much) this
>> looks fine to me. I am, however, a little unclear in when it should be
>> accepted.
>
> Since Herbert Xu ACKed the driver changes, I would say the only gating
> commit is Geert's CR clock patch.

These are queued for v4.19.

> If that one is in, than I would say this one should go in as well.

As the device node now has a power-domains property, the genpd code will
try to attach it to the CPG/MSSR PM Domain, which is a clock domain.
In the absence of the clock patch, the device's module clock cannot be
found, and dev_pm_domain_attach() and thus platform_drv_probe() will fail,
before calling the device driver's .probe() function.

So there is no longer a dependency on the clock patch, and the DT patch can
go in in parallel (although I prefer its subject to be changed
s/binding/device device/).

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-01 10:13    [W:0.072 / U:2.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site