lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add rpm and regulators for MTP
Date
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2018-04-27 22:42:48)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> index d6665e4f801f..ccbf6347aacb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
> @@ -220,6 +220,16 @@
> method = "smc";
> };
>
> + rpm_glink: rpm-glink {
> + compatible = "qcom,glink-rpm";
> +
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +
> + qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>;
> +
> + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 0>;

Why so many newlines?

> + };
> +
> soc: soc {};
> };
>
> @@ -337,4 +347,77 @@
> #interrupt-cells = <4>;
> cell-index = <0>;
> };
> +
> + rpm_msg_ram: memory@68000 {

unit address doesn't match reg property.

> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-msg-ram";
> + reg = <0x778000 0x7000>;
> + };
> +
> + apcs_glb: mailbox@9820000 {

unit address doesn't match reg property.

> + compatible = "qcom,msm8998-apcs-hmss-global";
> + reg = <0x17911000 0x1000>;
> +
> + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&rpm_glink {
> + rpm_requests {
> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-msm8998";
> + qcom,glink-channels = "rpm_requests";
> +
> + pm8998-regulators {
> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8998-regulators";
> +
> + pm8998_s1: s1 {};
> + pm8998_s2: s2 {};
> + pm8998_s3: s3 {};
> + pm8998_s4: s4 {};
> + pm8998_s5: s5 {};
> + pm8998_s6: s6 {};
> + pm8998_s7: s7 {};
> + pm8998_s8: s8 {};
> + pm8998_s9: s9 {};
> + pm8998_s10: s10 {};
> + pm8998_s11: s11 {};
> + pm8998_s12: s12 {};
> + pm8998_s13: s13 {};
> + pm8998_l1: l1 {};
> + pm8998_l2: l2 {};
> + pm8998_l3: l3 {};
> + pm8998_l4: l4 {};
> + pm8998_l5: l5 {};
> + pm8998_l6: l6 {};
> + pm8998_l7: l7 {};
> + pm8998_l8: l8 {};
> + pm8998_l9: l9 {};
> + pm8998_l10: l10 {};
> + pm8998_l11: l11 {};
> + pm8998_l12: l12 {};
> + pm8998_l13: l13 {};
> + pm8998_l14: l14 {};
> + pm8998_l15: l15 {};
> + pm8998_l16: l16 {};
> + pm8998_l17: l17 {};
> + pm8998_l18: l18 {};
> + pm8998_l19: l19 {};
> + pm8998_l20: l20 {};
> + pm8998_l21: l21 {};
> + pm8998_l22: l22 {};
> + pm8998_l23: l23 {};
> + pm8998_l24: l24 {};
> + pm8998_l25: l25 {};
> + pm8998_l26: l26 {};
> + pm8998_l27: l27 {};
> + pm8998_l28: l28 {};
> + pm8998_lvs1: lvs1 {};
> + pm8998_lvs2: lvs2 {};

What's the benefit to having the nodes here instead of in each board?

> + };
> +
> + pmi8998-regulators {
> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-pmi8998-regulators";
> +
> + pmi8998_bob: bob {};
> + };

These may be board specific? So each regulator container would need
status = "disabled" and then status = "okay" in the board file.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-08 01:04    [W:0.061 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site