[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 06/13] KVM: x86: Add Intel Processor Trace virtualization mode
On 04/05/2018 12:38, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>> Or rather a parameter to decide who wins in case both host and guest want
>>> to trace the guest. That's arguably better than having different versions of
>>> PT in the guest depending on a module parameter setting.
>> It's not different versions; it's having PT vs. not having PT at all. I
>> don't really see it as a big issue. The nice thing about this series is
>> that the interactions between PT code and KVM code are minimal.
> Unfortunately, it gets it wrong. Like I just said in another email, if you
> switch off host's PT, you need to let them know, which this patchset doesn't
> do. And when it does, it would be the same amount of interaction with PT
> code as what would be required to get the dynamic guest PT right.

Two issues:

1) Is there a fast (10 clock cycles, better if less) way for KVM to know
"PT is enabled on the host", or a callback that KVM can register when
e.g. RTIT_CTL is written?

2) We'd have to write trace records into the guest. That does not sound
that easy. Does it entail parsing the ToPA and all that?



 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-04 23:53    [W:0.069 / U:2.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site