[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] mm->owner to mm->memcg fixes
On Wed 23-05-18 14:46:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> As two processes sharing an mm is useless and highly unlikely there is
> no need to handle this case well, it just needs to be handled well
> enough to prevent an indefinite loop. So when css_tryget_online fails
> just treat the mm as belong to the root memory cgroup.

Does that mean that a malicious user can construct such a task and
runaway from its limits?

Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-30 13:53    [W:0.122 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site