lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6] mfd: da9063: Replace model with type
Hi, Marek

On 05/26, Marek Vasut wrote:
>On 05/26/2018 11:16 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc6]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-x002-201820 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
>> reproduce:
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:10:0,
>> from drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:16:
>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function 'da9063_regulator_probe':
>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>> if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
>> ^~~~
>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^~
>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:58:42: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>> if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) : \
>> ^~~~
>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^~
>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:12: error: 'const struct da9063_dev_model' has no member named 'dev_model'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:69:16: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
>> ______r = !!(cond); \
>> ^~~~
>>>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:744:3: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
>> if (model->dev_model == da9063->type)
>> ^~
>> drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c:749:10: error: 'struct da9063' has no member named 'model'
>> da9063->model);
>> ^~
>>
>> vim +/if +744 drivers//regulator/da9063-regulator.c
>
>Is it testing this patch without the other patches in the series or at
>least 1/6 ?

It was tested with the whole patch series as you can see in https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/mfd-da9063-Rename-PMIC_DA9063-to-PMIC_CHIP_ID_DA9063/20180526-162613.


Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>--
>Best regards,
>Marek Vasut
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-30 07:24    [W:0.059 / U:7.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site