lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V1 1/3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Define new Register address map
From
Date


On 5/22/2018 11:39 PM, Evan Green wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:30 AM Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@codeaurora.org>
>
>> For SDCC version 5.0.0, MCI registers are removed from SDCC
>> interface and some registers are moved to HC.
>> Define a new data structure where we can statically define
>> the address offsets for the registers in different SDCC versions.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 89
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index bb11916..2524455 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -137,6 +137,95 @@
>> /* Timeout value to avoid infinite waiting for pwr_irq */
>> #define MSM_PWR_IRQ_TIMEOUT_MS 5000
>
>> +struct sdhci_msm_offset {
>> + u32 core_hc_mode;
>> + u32 core_mci_data_cnt;
>> + u32 core_mci_status;
>> + u32 core_mci_fifo_cnt;
>> + u32 core_mci_version;
>> + u32 core_generics;
>> + u32 core_testbus_config;
>> + u32 core_testbus_sel2_bit;
>> + u32 core_testbus_ena;
>> + u32 core_testbus_sel2;
>> + u32 core_pwrctl_status;
>> + u32 core_pwrctl_mask;
>> + u32 core_pwrctl_clear;
>> + u32 core_pwrctl_ctl;
>> + u32 core_sdcc_debug_reg;
>> + u32 core_dll_config;
>> + u32 core_dll_status;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr0;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr1;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec_func2;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec_capabilities0;
>> + u32 core_ddr_200_cfg;
>> + u32 core_vendor_spec3;
>> + u32 core_dll_config_2;
>> + u32 core_ddr_config;
>> + u32 core_ddr_config_2;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sdhci_msm_offset sdhci_msm_v5_offset = {
>> + .core_mci_data_cnt = 0x35c,
>> + .core_mci_status = 0x324,
>> + .core_mci_fifo_cnt = 0x308,
>> + .core_mci_version = 0x318,
>> + .core_generics = 0x320,
>> + .core_testbus_config = 0x32c,
>> + .core_testbus_sel2_bit = 3,
>> + .core_testbus_ena = (1 << 31),
>> + .core_testbus_sel2 = (1 << 3),
>> + .core_pwrctl_status = 0x240,
>> + .core_pwrctl_mask = 0x244,
>> + .core_pwrctl_clear = 0x248,
>> + .core_pwrctl_ctl = 0x24c,
>> + .core_sdcc_debug_reg = 0x358,
>> + .core_dll_config = 0x200,
>> + .core_dll_status = 0x208,
>> + .core_vendor_spec = 0x20c,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr0 = 0x214,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr1 = 0x218,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_func2 = 0x210,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_capabilities0 = 0x21c,
>> + .core_ddr_200_cfg = 0x224,
>> + .core_vendor_spec3 = 0x250,
>> + .core_dll_config_2 = 0x254,
>> + .core_ddr_config = 0x258,
>> + .core_ddr_config_2 = 0x25c,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct sdhci_msm_offset sdhci_msm_mci_offset = {
>> + .core_hc_mode = 0x78,
>> + .core_mci_data_cnt = 0x30,
>> + .core_mci_status = 0x34,
>> + .core_mci_fifo_cnt = 0x44,
>> + .core_mci_version = 0x050,
>> + .core_generics = 0x70,
>> + .core_testbus_config = 0x0CC,
>> + .core_testbus_sel2_bit = 4,
>> + .core_testbus_ena = (1 << 3),
>> + .core_testbus_sel2 = (1 << 4),
>> + .core_pwrctl_status = 0xDC,
>> + .core_pwrctl_mask = 0xE0,
>> + .core_pwrctl_clear = 0xE4,
>> + .core_pwrctl_ctl = 0xE8,
>> + .core_sdcc_debug_reg = 0x124,
>> + .core_dll_config = 0x100,
>> + .core_dll_status = 0x108,
>> + .core_vendor_spec = 0x10C,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr0 = 0x114,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_adma_err_addr1 = 0x118,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_func2 = 0x110,
>> + .core_vendor_spec_capabilities0 = 0x11C,
>> + .core_ddr_200_cfg = 0x184,
>> + .core_vendor_spec3 = 0x1B0,
>> + .core_dll_config_2 = 0x1B4,
>> + .core_ddr_config = 0x1B8,
>> + .core_ddr_config_2 = 0x1BC,
>> +};
>> +
>
> I notice a lot of these are never used in the subsequent patches of this
> series. I guess more register definitions are always better than fewer,
> it's just a shame that they take up space now. Did you just add everything
> that was different between v4 and v5, or how did you come up with this set?
>
> Also, I think lowercase hex letters are preferred.
>
> I verified that the v5 register offsets look good, at least for the
> registers I have documentation for.
>
Yeah, felt it better to include all registers even they are not used
currently.

Will change to use lowercase hex letters

> -Evan
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-24 14:29    [W:0.071 / U:1.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site