[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: tegra20: Fix imbalanced clock enable count
On 24.05.2018 12:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:30:39 AM CEST Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 23.05.2018 08:58, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 23-05-18, 00:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Tegra20-cpufreq driver missed enabling the CPU clocks. This results in a
>>>> clock-enable refcount disbalance on PLL_P <-> PLL_X reparent, causing
>>>> PLL_X to get disabled while it shouldn't. Fix this by enabling the clocks
>>>> on the driver probe.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <>
>>>> ---
>>>> CPUFreq maintainers,
>>>> Please take into account that this patch is made on top of my recent
>>>> series of patches [0] "Clean up Tegra20 cpufreq driver" that was fully
>>>> reviewed, but seems not applied yet. Let me know if you prefer to re-spin
>>>> the [0], including this patch into the series.
>>>> [0]
>>> This is already picked by Rafael and is sitting in pm/bleeding-edge
>>> branch. Should get merged into linux-next in a day or two.
>> Neat, thank you for letting me know.
> It actually is there in my linux-next branch, but linux-next proper is not
> taking new material this week AFAICS.

I've found it in yours git repo, thank you.

> You'll see this in linux-next on Monday, most probably.

Yes, I noticed that linux-next stopped updating for awhile.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-24 14:19    [W:0.057 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site