lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block drivers/block: Use octal not symbolic permissions
From
Date
On 5/24/18 7:01 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 06:47 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/23/18 4:35 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 15:27 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 5/23/18 2:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>> Convert the S_<FOO> symbolic permissions to their octal equivalents as
>>>>> using octal and not symbolic permissions is preferred by many as more
>>>>> readable.
>>>>>
>>>>> see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/2/1945
>>>>>
>>>>> Done with automated conversion via:
>>>>> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS --fix-inplace <files...>
>>>>>
>>>>> Miscellanea:
>>>>>
>>>>> o Wrapped modified multi-line calls to a single line where appropriate
>>>>> o Realign modified multi-line calls to open parenthesis
>>>>
>>>> Honestly, I see this as pretty needless churn.
>>>
>>> btw:
>>>
>>> There is currently a mixture of symbolic and octal
>>> permissions uses in block and drivers/block
>>>
>>> ie: 94 octal and 146 symbolic uses.
>>>
>>> If this is applied, all would become octal.
>>
>> That does help justify the change. My main worry here is creating
>> unnecessary conflicts, which is always annoying. But it's even more
>> annoying when the change creating the conflict isn't really that
>> important at all. Case in point, the patch doesn't apply to the
>> for-4.18/block branch that it should go into...
>
> Done against most recent -next as it's basically impossible
> to do anything against multiple private trees.
>
> Also, the script that generated the patch is in the changelog
> so it's simple to rerun.

Alright, applied, thanks.

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-24 21:40    [W:0.049 / U:0.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site