[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: semantics of rhashtable and sysvipc
On Wed, 23 May 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>So I'm perfectly fine with getting rid of 'tables_initialized'. But no, not
>with a BUG_ON().
>If you cannot guarantee that the allocation works (using __GFP_NOFAIL is
>ok, for example - but it only works with small allocations), then you need
>to handle the allocation failure.

Note that even if the allocation was guaranteed, there are still param validations
and rhashtable_init() can return -EINVAL.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-23 20:48    [W:0.059 / U:0.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site