lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] bpf: check NULL for sk_to_full_sk()
From
Date
On 2018/5/21 23:17, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 05/21/2018 12:55 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
>> like commit df39a9f106d5 ("bpf: check NULL for sk_to_full_sk() return value"),
>> we should check sk_to_full_sk return value against NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> index 30d15e6..fd3fbeb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_check_dev_permission(short dev_type, u32 major, u32 minor,
>> int __ret = 0; \
>> if (cgroup_bpf_enabled && sk && sk == skb->sk) { \
>> typeof(sk) __sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk); \
>> - if (sk_fullsock(__sk)) \
>> + if (__sk && sk_fullsock(__sk)) \
>> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(__sk, skb, \
>> BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS); \
>> } \
>>
>
> Why is this needed ???

BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS is called in ip_output

I just misunderstood, sorry for noise.
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-22 05:31    [W:0.053 / U:1.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site