lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: Fix compiler errors
Hello,

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:43:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Emil Goode wrote:
> > The compiler is complaining with the following errors:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c:94:48: error:
> > passing argument 3 of ‘dma_alloc_wc’ from incompatible pointer type
> > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >
> > drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c:113:48: error:
> > passing argument 3 of ‘dma_alloc_wc’ from incompatible pointer type
> > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >
> > The expected pointer type of the third argument to dma_alloc_wc() is
> > dma_addr_t but phys_addr_t is passed. Fix this by adding casts to the
> > expected pointer type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emil.fsw@goode.io>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
> > index 28541b280739..5e8b321a751e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
> > @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static int host1x_pushbuffer_init(struct push_buffer *pb)
> >
> > size = iova_align(&host1x->iova, size);
> >
> > - pb->mapped = dma_alloc_wc(host1x->dev, size, &pb->phys,
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > + pb->mapped = dma_alloc_wc(host1x->dev, size,
> > + (dma_addr_t *)&pb->phys, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!pb->mapped)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ static int host1x_pushbuffer_init(struct push_buffer *pb)
> > if (err)
> > goto iommu_free_iova;
> > } else {
> > - pb->mapped = dma_alloc_wc(host1x->dev, size, &pb->phys,
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > + pb->mapped = dma_alloc_wc(host1x->dev, size,
> > + (dma_addr_t *)&pb->phys, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!pb->mapped)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> This doesn't seem right. There's no guarantee that phys_addr_t and
> dma_addr_t will be compatible, so the above isn't always correct. Also,
> I don't see a need for pb->phys to ever be phys_addr_t. It's allocated
> through dma_alloc_wc() exclusively, so it should just be dma_addr_t.

I agree that this is a better solution, however when changing pb->phys to dma_addr_t
the type will be wrong when it's passed to iommu_map() as phys_addr_t is expected
but that doesn't cause a compilation error.

> Note that the !pb->phys check in host1x_pushbuffer_destroy() becomes
> technically wrong if pb->phys is dma_addr_t (0 is a perfectly valid
> value for dma_addr_t), so make sure to flip that to !pb->mapped instead.
> pb->mapped and pb->phys are always set in tandem, and checking mapped
> for non-NULL is the right check to test whether the pair is valid or
> not.

Ok I will change this as well.

Best regards,

Emil

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-15 23:08    [W:0.103 / U:2.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site