lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] ASoC: da7219: read fmw property to get mclk for non-dts systems
From
Date


On 5/7/2018 12:09 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 10:50 PM Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@amd.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 5/4/2018 2:45 PM, Adam Thomson wrote:
>>> On 03 May 2018 08:59, Akshu Agrawal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Non-dts based systems can use ACPI DSDT to pass on the mclk
>>>> to da7219.
>>>> This enables da7219 mclk to be linked to system clock.
>>>> Enable/Disable of the mclk is already handled in the codec so
>>>> platform drivers don't have to explicitly do handling of mclk.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Fixed kbuild error
>>>> v3: Add corresponding clk_put for clk_get
>>>> include/sound/da7219.h | 2 ++
>>>> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/sound/da7219.h b/include/sound/da7219.h
>>>> index 1bfcb16..df7ddf4 100644
>>>> --- a/include/sound/da7219.h
>>>> +++ b/include/sound/da7219.h
>>>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct da7219_pdata {
>>>>
>>>> const char *dai_clks_name;
>>>>
>>>> + const char *mclk_name;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Mic */
>>>> enum da7219_micbias_voltage micbias_lvl;
>>>> enum da7219_mic_amp_in_sel mic_amp_in_sel;
>>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
>>>> index 980a6a8..ecd46fc 100644
>>>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
>>>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
>>>> @@ -1624,6 +1624,8 @@ static struct da7219_pdata
> *da7219_fw_to_pdata(struct
>>>> snd_soc_component *compone
>>>> dev_warn(dev, "Using default clk name: %s\n",
>>>> pdata->dai_clks_name);
>>>>
>>>> + device_property_read_string(dev, "dlg,mclk-name",
> &pdata->mclk_name);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Personally am still not keen on this. To me the use of a
> device_property_*
>>> function suggests the same property resides in both DT and ACPI, but
> here we're
>>> only using this for the ACPI case. DT has no want or need for this. I
> still feel
>>> we should look at something more generic in the clock framework,
> although I do
>>> agree with Mark that this should be properly specced.
>>>
>
>> I am not an expert in field of ACPI, IMO forming a Spec and changing
>> ACPI to have DT like clock framework is good to have but a bigger change
>> which should be taken up later.
>
>> The current code of handling of mclk in the driver is usable only by DT.
>> The device_property (though ACPI specific) makes this code, a common
>> code for DT and ACPI based devices.
>
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/acpi/DSD-properties-rules.txt
>> "....Still, for the sake of code re-use, it may make sense to provide as
>> much of the configuration data as possible in the form of device
>> properties and complement that with an ACPI-specific mechanism suitable
>> for the use case at hand......"
>
> This sounds like a pretty reasonable justification for addressing the issue
> using DSD to me.
> For what its worth, you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>
>

Hi Mark,

If you are Ok with this patch can you please take this.

Thanks,
Akshu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-15 11:44    [W:0.097 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site