lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] media: i2c: mt9t112: Add device tree support
Hi Sakari,

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 12:32:19PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:00:14PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:

[snip]

> > static int mt9t112_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > const struct i2c_device_id *did)
> > {
> > struct mt9t112_priv *priv;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (!client->dev.platform_data) {
> > + if (!client->dev.of_node && !client->dev.platform_data) {
> > dev_err(&client->dev, "mt9t112: missing platform data!\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -1081,23 +1118,39 @@ static int mt9t112_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > if (!priv)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - priv->info = client->dev.platform_data;
> > priv->init_done = false;
> > -
> > - v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, client, &mt9t112_subdev_ops);
> > -
> > - priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "extclk");
> > - if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) == -ENOENT) {
> > + priv->dev = &client->dev;
> > +
> > + if (client->dev.platform_data) {
> > + priv->info = client->dev.platform_data;
> > +
> > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "extclk");
>
> extclk needs to be documented in DT binding documentation.
>
> > + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) == -ENOENT) {
> > + priv->clk = NULL;
> > + } else if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev,
> > + "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * External clock frequencies != 24MHz are only supported
> > + * for non-OF systems.
> > + */
>
> Shouldn't you actually set the frequency? Or perhaps even better to check
> it, and use assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-rates properties?
>

I might be confused, but my intention was to use an external clock
reference, with a configurable frequency only in the platform data use
case. As you can see in this 'else' branch, in OF case, the priv->clk
field is null, and all the PLL and clock computations are performed
assuming a 24MHz input clock.

In my opinion, as the driver when running on OF systems does not
get any reference to 'extclk' clock, it should not be documented in
bindings. Do you agree?

Thanks
j

> > priv->clk = NULL;
> > - } else if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get clock \"extclk\"\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> > + priv->info = &mt9t112_default_pdata_24MHz;
> > +
> > + ret = mt9t112_parse_dt(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - priv->standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "standby",
> > + v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, client, &mt9t112_subdev_ops);
> > +
> > + priv->standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "powerdown",
> > GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->standby_gpio)) {
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get gpio \"standby\"\n");
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get gpio \"powerdown\"\n");
> > return PTR_ERR(priv->standby_gpio);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1124,9 +1177,19 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id mt9t112_id[] = {
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mt9t112_id);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> > +static const struct of_device_id mt9t112_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "micron,mt9t111", },
> > + { .compatible = "micron,mt9t112", },
> > + { /* sentinel */ },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt9t112_of_match);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static struct i2c_driver mt9t112_i2c_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "mt9t112",
> > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mt9t112_of_match),
>
> No need to use of_match_ptr().
>
> > },
> > .probe = mt9t112_probe,
> > .remove = mt9t112_remove,
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-14 16:32    [W:0.095 / U:3.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site