lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] udf: Simplify calls to udf_disk_stamp_to_time
Hello,

On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
> part of solving the y2038 problem.
>
> commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use mktime64()")
> eliminated the NULL return condition from udf_disk_stamp_to_time().
> udf_time_to_disk_time() is always called with a valid dest pointer and
> the return value is ignored.
> Further, caller can as well check the dest pointer being passed in rather
> than return argument.
> Make both the functions return void.
>
> This will make the inode timestamp conversion simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: jack@suse.com

I'm fine with this. Just one bug below:

> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index 0d27d41f5c6e..bd0ae64bc31c 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -862,6 +862,9 @@ static int udf_load_pvoldesc(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
> struct buffer_head *bh;
> uint16_t ident;
> int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +#ifdef UDFFS_DEBUG
> + struct timestamp *ts;
> +#endif
>
> outstr = kmalloc(128, GFP_NOFS);
> if (!outstr)
> @@ -880,15 +883,14 @@ static int udf_load_pvoldesc(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
>
> pvoldesc = (struct primaryVolDesc *)bh->b_data;
>
> - if (udf_disk_stamp_to_time(&UDF_SB(sb)->s_record_time,
> - pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime)) {
> + udf_disk_stamp_to_time(&UDF_SB(sb)->s_record_time,
> + pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime);
> #ifdef UDFFS_DEBUG
> - struct timestamp *ts = &pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime;
> - udf_debug("recording time %04u/%02u/%02u %02u:%02u (%x)\n",
> - le16_to_cpu(ts->year), ts->month, ts->day, ts->hour,
> - ts->minute, le16_to_cpu(ts->typeAndTimezone));
> + *ts = &pvoldesc->recordingDateAndTime;

This should be 'ts ='.

Do you prefer me taking this patch through my tree or will you carry it as
a part of your series?

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-14 15:58    [W:0.095 / U:1.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site